From establishing jurisdiction to obtaining and enforcing judgment — we handle every stage of China-US commercial litigation with deep knowledge of both legal systems.
Filing a lawsuit against a Chinese company or individual in a US court presents unique challenges that standard US litigation experience alone cannot address. You need an attorney who understands both systems — and has the tools to bridge them.
Jurisdiction analysis under Chinese corporate law, service of process via Hague Convention, and strategy around Chinese defendants who may ignore US proceedings — these require specialized knowledge most US litigators don't have.
The first question in any case against a Chinese party is whether a US court has personal jurisdiction over them. Courts may have jurisdiction when the Chinese party:
We evaluate your specific facts to determine the strongest jurisdictional argument and the best US court for your case.
Once filed, your Chinese defendant must be properly served. This requires Hague Convention service through China's Ministry of Justice ILCC system — a process we specialize in. Improper service (FedEx, email, etc.) will invalidate your entire case.
→ Learn about our Hague Convention Service process
Many Chinese defendants in US litigation take one of two approaches:
When defendants ignore the proceedings and fail to respond after valid service, we move for default judgment — a judgment in your favor without a trial. This is a powerful tool, particularly when combined with asset recovery strategy.
Obtaining a default judgment against a Chinese party is achievable. The harder part is collecting on that judgment. This is why we combine litigation strategy with asset tracing from day one — identifying US-based Chinese assets before filing.
After obtaining a US judgment, you have two primary enforcement avenues:
Option A — Enforce Against US Assets: If the Chinese party holds US bank accounts, real estate, receivables, or other US-situs property, we can execute the judgment directly in US courts.
Option B — Seek Recognition in China: While no US-China judgment recognition treaty exists, Chinese courts have in certain cases applied reciprocity principles to recognize US judgments. This is complex, requiring Chinese co-counsel, and is not guaranteed — but increasingly viable.
How to find U.S. assets of a Chinese defendant
Default judgment after service in China
When you can seek default after serving a Chinese defendant
China Hague service translation requirements
What if China's Ministry of Justice rejects the service request?
What if the Chinese defendant name does not match the registry?
Serving a Hong Kong company vs. mainland China defendant
When alternative service may be available after failed Hague service
China Hague service pricing and quote drivers
What increases China Hague service cost?
China service completed, certificate delayed, and default timing
Serving a Chinese manufacturer in a U.S. lawsuit
China service record for default motion practice
What if a Chinese defendant appears after Hague service?
Settlement leverage after China Hague service
China service and motion to dismiss risk
Forum selection clause in a Chinese company lawsuit
Pre-suit evidence checklist for a China defendant
China Hague service for online marketplace seller lawsuits
Registered address vs. operating address for China service
Collecting a U.S. judgment against a Chinese company
Post-judgment discovery for Chinese defendant U.S. assets
Chinese company dissolved or cancelled before Hague service
Adding a Chinese defendant after filing and Hague service timing
Chinese affiliate or successor liability and Hague service
Can a U.S. subsidiary accept service for a Chinese parent?
Settlement talks before China Hague service
Serving a Chinese individual owner or guarantor
Personal jurisdiction over a Chinese company in U.S. court
Chinese supplier breach of contract lawsuit evidence
Demand letter before suing a Chinese company
Chinese supplier disappeared after receiving a deposit
Fake Chinese supplier wire-fraud lawsuit planning
Defective goods from a Chinese manufacturer evidence checklist
Payment beneficiary different from Chinese supplier
Using U.S. importer and distributor records in Chinese manufacturer lawsuits
Expedited discovery for Chinese defendant U.S. assets
Temporary restraining order against a Chinese company and Hague service planning
Asset dissipation evidence against a Chinese defendant
Preliminary injunction against a Chinese company
Prejudgment asset freeze against a Chinese defendant
Chinese buyer unpaid invoice lawsuit evidence
Chinese buyer refuses to pay after delivery
China trade receivables collection evidence
Branch, factory, or headquarters address for China service
Chinese supplier sales-agent authority and service risks
Every China-US case is unique. Schedule a consultation to evaluate jurisdiction, service strategy, and realistic recovery prospects.
Book Consultation ($99)Your Chinese factory or supplier failed to deliver goods, delivered defective products, or disappeared with your deposit. We can file in US courts if jurisdictional contacts exist, or coordinate action in both jurisdictions.
Read the manufacturer service guide
Supplier breach lawsuit evidence checklist
Counterfeit products from a Chinese supplier
Invoice and packing-list discrepancy
Letter of credit dispute
Pro forma invoice mismatch
Incoterms and risk of loss
Alibaba Trade Assurance payment dispute
Supplier lawsuit statute of limitations
Purchase order terms in supplier lawsuits
Arbitration clause review
Supplier disappeared after deposit
Fake supplier wire fraud
Defective goods evidence
Sample vs bulk goods evidence
Rejected shipment refund claim
Warranty replacement claim
Payment beneficiary mismatch
Importer and distributor records
Personal jurisdiction review
Prejudgment asset-freeze planning
Expedited asset discovery
TRO and service planning
Asset dissipation evidence
Emergency injunction and service planning
Branch/factory/headquarters address for service
Sales-agent authority and contract evidence
Chinese buyer unpaid invoice lawsuit
Buyer refuses to pay after delivery
Trade receivables collection evidence
Business email compromise, fake product scams, fraudulent wire transfers, or investment fraud originating from China. We work with forensic accountants and Chinese counsel to trace funds and pursue recovery.
Chinese buyers or distributors who received your goods or services but refuse to pay. We analyze the contract, applicable law, and asset position to recommend the most efficient recovery path.
Chinese companies selling counterfeit or infringing products on Amazon, Alibaba, or through US distributors. We combine DMCA, trademark enforcement, and civil litigation for maximum impact.
Chinese partners misappropriating assets, refusing distributions, or violating JV agreements. Complex cross-border matters requiring coordinated US and Chinese proceedings.
Chinese investors defrauded in US real estate, or US parties defrauded by Chinese investment promoters. We handle both investor-side and defense-side matters.
Standard US litigators — no matter how skilled — face critical blind spots in China-US cases:
Hao Li, Esq. combines Florida/Minnesota bar membership, CFA credentials, and direct ILCC system access with fluent Mandarin and deep understanding of China's legal and business systems.
Finberg Firm PLLC · South Florida
You should get help before filing, serving, or relying on default deadlines. Finberg Firm can review the documents, Chinese party details, and U.S. court posture.
Key records often include the complaint, summons, contracts, invoices, Chinese names and addresses, translations, court orders, and any prior service or settlement communications.
Use the contact button to send the case posture, target party information, and deadline concerns. Finberg Firm can identify next steps for China service or litigation strategy.
The page covers service, procedure, and practical litigation planning across China-US disputes.
Yes. Cross-border procedure can change both litigation timing and leverage.
Yes. The site includes support for attorneys and law firms.